Arguments against spanking Essays - Parenting, Childrens Rights

Arguments against spanking Arguments against Spanking Spanking is one of the most common methods of discipline used by parents. Even though the very same parents do not condone hitting people, they believe that spanking is a quick and effective method for exterminating unwanted behavior or encouraging desired behavior (Ramsburg). Ironically, by using a violent and hurtful means of discipline, parents are instilling negative values in their children. Basically, it is immoral to spank children. Furthermore, the moral consequences of spanking children has lifelong adverse effects. was very heartbreaking. Parent should think on negative side of spanking. First of all, spanking has a dangerous effect on childrens mind. Parents dont realize that by hurting their children physically they also hurt them mentally. At a young age, the effect of spanking remains in childrens minds forever and becomes an unforgiving part of their personalites. Spanking may develop mental health problems, such as depression and suicidality. According to Greven's theory," Depression is often a delayed responce to the supression of childhood anger from being physically hit and hert by adults whom the child loves and on whom he or she depends on furturance and life itself"( Greven, 1991,p129) When I was in a middle school,I had one friend whose parent always beat him for small problems. This was one of the reason why he became very introverted fearful and insecure in himself person. He belived that he was not good at anything because his parents spanked him. I saw him often in a sad mood. He was frustrated and was not able to do any thing accurately. Eventually, he got a depression . After some time he became mad and commited suicide. It was very heartbreaking. Yet many of my other friends would say, "I was spanked as a child and I came out Ok".That's true. But the implication is false. For instance,that's what my father was saying years ago, when he was resisting stopping smoking: "I've been smoking for 25 years, and I'm OK." He was one of the lucky ones; the death rate from lung cancer for heavy smokers is about 1 in 3. That same statistic means that two thirds will not get lung cancer. Parent should think of the negative sides of spanking. Spanking is also not good for childrens education. Spanking creates fear in children . This fear causes harmful effect on childrens education. Dr. Daniel Whiteside reported that Corporal punishment of children actually interferes with the process of learning (Plain Talk About Spanking). Because of the fear caused by spanking, children do not tell truth to their parents. They are afraid to tell what grades they get on exam because they knows that if parent does not satisfy with this grades,they will beat them.When I was a child, on fifth class exam I failed one subject. I was afraid of my father, so I did not tell the truth. Because I did not tell the truth to my father I could not further concentrate on my study. Fathers spanking nature distracted me whenever I tried to learned so something. Because of this, I also failed the final exam of fifth class. I believe that parents should understand the circumstances for their childrens bad grades. Spanking children may train them to use violence as a form of resolving problems. Parents think that if they beat their children, then their children will behave properly, but this is the wrong way of thinking.Children become violent as an effect of spanking. At a young age, children learn all things very fast weather it is good or bad. Hitting a child for punishment might make them think hitting is okay to use on their friends and family. Parents spank their children even if they do small mistake. As a result, children also hit other children if they do not behave well to them. In the long run, children became used to spanking. Then, they are not afraid of their parents. Eventually, they beat their own parents.They do not give respect to them. In childhood, my parents always beat my younger brother because he never listened to them. After some time, he became used to it and became a violent person. He always beat others and did whatever

Do Tax Cuts Stimulate the Economy essays

Do Tax Cuts Stimulate the Economy essays Cutting taxes by federal, state, and local governments will always stimulate the economy in any economic environment. It seems that the debate on the pros and cons of cutting taxes is more prominent during a recession or downturn in the economy, as is the case now, but tax cuts should always be a top priority for everyone from politicians to voters. The most recent presidential proposal is the Bush Stimulus Package, based on his vision for economic recovery, low taxes, low spending on social services, high military spending. Under his view, reducing tax rates for businesses and rich individuals stimulates investment (Keen 2003, p. A5). Taxes are only one of many factors that affect the economy. National security, the possibility of war, and the insecurity of investors are a few other factors, but since the tragedy of 9-11, the economy has been in a downturn and continues to tumble. It needs something to turn it around and tax cuts are one of the solutions needed, but combining tax cuts with other solutions will help stimulate the economy much faster. The theory of tax cuts stimulating the economy is referred to by most people as supply-side economics as well as several other names such as trickle-down economics or Reaganomics. During the Ronald Reagan presidency, it became known as Reaganomics, but many people today use the terms interchangeably. The central concept of supply-side economics is that cuts in the tax rates spur economic growth by providing entrepreneurs an incentive to invest the extra tax dollars saved by tax cuts, causing many of them to earn more money and pay more taxes on their earnings, even at a lower tax rate, which creates new jobs. These new jobs result in a larger employment base and, therefore more taxpayers. There are more taxpayers because of the newly created jobs, therefore a larger tax base, which means higher tax revenues for the government (Limbaugh 1993, p.117). Debates over t...